Abstract
Introduction: Organ donors frequently develop hyperglycaemia, which is managed with insulin on intensive care. It is unclear what proportion of this hyperglycaemia is caused by reversible insulin resistance and how much is caused by beta-cell death. We hypothesised that Donor Insulin Use (DIU) on intensive care is a predictor of pancreas and islet transplant outcomes.
Methods: Data on organ donors from the United Kingdom (UK) Transplant Registry was linked with regional data from our solid organ pancreas transplant (SPT) programme (2010-2015) and with national data from the UK Islet Transplant Consortium (2008-2016). Regression models determined associations between DIU and 3-month graft function and survival.
Results: In 168 SPT recipients, DIR was associated with a higher rate of early graft loss from non-technical failure (failure rate: DIR vs. no-DIR: 6/71 [8.5%] vs 1/97 (1.0%], odds ratio, 95% CI: 8.9, 1.04-75.3, p=0.046) and lower 72-hours post-transplantation c-peptide (n=46; DIU vs. no-DIR: 1431 (1117) vs. 2496 (1702) pmol/L, p=0.005). In 91 islet cell transplant (ICT) recipients, DIR was associated with a higher 3-month HbA1c (n=74; DIU vs. no-DIU: 51 (15) vs. 45 (9) mmol/mol, p=0.044) and a higher 90-minute stimulated glucose levels (n=74, 15.9 (6.3) vs. 12.7 (4.3) mmol/l, p=0.012).
Conclusion: In SPT and ICT recipients, DIU in intensive care is adversely related to measures of graft loss and function. Clinicians should be aware that DIU could be a marker of beta-cell death in donor pancreata. However, it would be premature to change clinical practice based on these preliminary data. Further research is required to; a) assess whether DIU can improve the prediction of graft outcomes; and b) develop objective tests of beta-cell death in potential donor pancreata.
Methods: Data on organ donors from the United Kingdom (UK) Transplant Registry was linked with regional data from our solid organ pancreas transplant (SPT) programme (2010-2015) and with national data from the UK Islet Transplant Consortium (2008-2016). Regression models determined associations between DIU and 3-month graft function and survival.
Results: In 168 SPT recipients, DIR was associated with a higher rate of early graft loss from non-technical failure (failure rate: DIR vs. no-DIR: 6/71 [8.5%] vs 1/97 (1.0%], odds ratio, 95% CI: 8.9, 1.04-75.3, p=0.046) and lower 72-hours post-transplantation c-peptide (n=46; DIU vs. no-DIR: 1431 (1117) vs. 2496 (1702) pmol/L, p=0.005). In 91 islet cell transplant (ICT) recipients, DIR was associated with a higher 3-month HbA1c (n=74; DIU vs. no-DIU: 51 (15) vs. 45 (9) mmol/mol, p=0.044) and a higher 90-minute stimulated glucose levels (n=74, 15.9 (6.3) vs. 12.7 (4.3) mmol/l, p=0.012).
Conclusion: In SPT and ICT recipients, DIU in intensive care is adversely related to measures of graft loss and function. Clinicians should be aware that DIU could be a marker of beta-cell death in donor pancreata. However, it would be premature to change clinical practice based on these preliminary data. Further research is required to; a) assess whether DIU can improve the prediction of graft outcomes; and b) develop objective tests of beta-cell death in potential donor pancreata.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 29 Mar 2019 |
Keywords
- Organ donor
- insulin
- pancreas
- islet
- transplant