Abstract
Nongovernmental organizations have attracted growing criticism for being unrepresentative of and unaccountable to the poor people for whose well-being they claim to work. Research on Dutch and Peruvian NGOs suggests this happens in part because the chronic weakness of popular organizations makes it difficult for NGOs to reach the poorest groups. However, such problems of representation also occur because trends within the aid chain have made it increasingly difficult for NGOs to understand livelihood dynamics or new organizational possibilities among rural populations. Informed by out-of-date and agrarian representations of these groups, interventions become biased toward the less poor. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 937-950 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | World Development |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- Aid chains
- Livelihoods
- NGO
- Peru
- Poverty interventions
- Representation
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Global Development Institute
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Donor-NGO relations and representations of livelihood in nongovernmental aid ahains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver