Dorsomedial striatum involvement in regulating conflict between current and presumed outcomes

Anna Mestres-Missé, Pierre Louis Bazin, Robert Trampel, Robert Turner, Sonja A. Kotz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The balance between automatic and controlled processing is essential to human flexible but optimal behavior. On the one hand, the automation of habitual behavior and processing is indispensable, and, on the other hand, strategic processing is needed in light of unexpected, conflicting, or new situations. Using ultra-high-field high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (7. T-fMRI), the present study examined the role of subcortical structures in mediating this balance. Participants were asked to judge the congruency of sentences containing a semantically ambiguous or unambiguous word. Ambiguous sentences had three possible resolutions: dominant meaning, subordinate meaning, and incongruent. The dominant interpretation represents the most habitual response, whereas both the subordinate and incongruent options clash with this automatic response, and, hence, require cognitive control. Moreover, the subordinate resolution entails a less expected but correct outcome, while the incongruent condition is simply wrong. The current results reveal the involvement of the anterior dorsomedial striatum in modulating and resolving conflict between actual and expected outcomes, and highlight the importance of cortical and subcortical cooperation in this process. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)159-167
    Number of pages8
    JournalNeuroImage
    Volume98
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • 7T-fMRI
    • Ambiguity
    • Cognitive control
    • Conflict
    • Striatum

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dorsomedial striatum involvement in regulating conflict between current and presumed outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this