Ear packing after ear surgery: Is it really necessary?

J. Borgstein, G. De Zwart, I. A. Bruce

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: We question the need for packing of the ear canal after ear surgery. For several years, it had not been the first author's standard practice to use post-operative ear packing. During this period, few problems or complications had been encountered. Setting: Tertiary referral, academic, paediatric hospital. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all children who had undergone major ear surgery in our unit over the last year was carried out. These cases represented a full range of otological procedures. Post-operative complications and infections in the first six post-operative weeks were recorded. Results: A total of 135 ears were operated upon in 107 patients ranging in age from 11 months to 19 years (mean 9.5 years). During this time period, eight children (7.5 per cent) developed a post-operative ear infection. No cases of tympanic or meatal granulations, problems with the tympanomeatal flap, or meatal stenosis were encountered. All infections were successfully managed with topical antibiotics. Discussion: We conclude that packing after ear surgery may be safely abandoned. This would not only save valuable operating time, but would also obviate the need for pack removal, always a source of discomfort and anxiety. This is especially important in children, who may subsequently require a further general anaesthesia in order to remove the pack. © 2007 JLO (1984) Limited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)253-254
    Number of pages1
    JournalThe Journal of laryngology and otology
    Volume122
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

    Keywords

    • Bandages
    • Complications
    • Occlusive Dressings
    • Otologic Surgical Procedures

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ear packing after ear surgery: Is it really necessary?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this