Early intervention service for psychosis: Views from primary care

Laoise Renwick, Blanaid Gavin, Nicola McGlade, Paul Lacey, Ray Goggins, Deirdre Jackson, Niall Turner, Sharon Foley, Stephen McWilliams, Caragh Behan, Elizabeth Lawlor, Walter Cullen, Eadbhard O'Callaghan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Aim: Although General Practitioners (GPs) have a pivotal role in early detection and treatment of psychosis, there is sparse information on their views of early intervention (EI) services and how information related to EI should be delivered. Method: Since inception, DETECT (Dublin East Treatment and Early Care Team), Ireland's pilot EI project, mailed information packs and provided information through the local GP continuing medical education (CME) network. After 1year, we surveyed GPs within DETECT's catchment area for their views on the service being provided. Results: One hundred and twenty-six (36%) responded and 80% found the EI service very/extremely useful. GPs reported that the combination of CME session and information packs were more useful than information packs alone. Those who attended CME meetings were significantly more likely to refer suspected cases (P <0.01) and more likely to find the service useful (P <0.001). Conclusion: The EI service for psychosis is well-received among GPs. Information about EI delivered through CME appears to have a greater impact on referral rates and satisfaction levels than mailed information. © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)285-290
    Number of pages5
    JournalEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
    Volume2
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • Continuing medical education
    • Early detection
    • General practice
    • Psychosis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Early intervention service for psychosis: Views from primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this