Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile

Kevin O'Brien; Tatiana Macfarlane; Jean Wright; Frances Conboy; Priscilla Appelbe; David Birnie; Stephen Chadwick; Ivan Connolly; Mark Hammond; Nigel Harradine; David Lewis; Simon Littlewood; Catherine McDade; Laura Mitchell; Alison Murray; Julian O'Neill; Jonathan Sandler; Micheal Read; Stephen Robinson; Iain Shaw; Elizabeth Turbill

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile

Kevin O'Brien, Tatiana Macfarlane, Jean Wright, Frances Conboy, Priscilla Appelbe, David Birnie, Stephen Chadwick, Ivan Connolly, Mark Hammond, Nigel Harradine, David Lewis, Simon Littlewood, Catherine McDade, Laura Mitchell, Alison Murray, Julian O'Neill, Jonathan Sandler, Micheal Read, Stephen Robinson, Iain ShawElizabeth Turbill

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness. Methods: Silhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness. Results: Early orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	580-585
Number of pages	5
Journal	American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume	135
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020
Publication status	Published - May 2009

Keywords

Child
Dentition, Mixed
Esthetics, Dental
anatomy & histology: Face
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Male
therapy: Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
instrumentation: Orthodontics, Interceptive
Peer Group
Self Concept
Treatment Outcome

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

Cite this

O'Brien, K., Macfarlane, T., Wright, J., Conboy, F., Appelbe, P., Birnie, D., Chadwick, S., Connolly, I., Hammond, M., Harradine, N., Lewis, D., Littlewood, S., McDade, C., Mitchell, L., Murray, A., O'Neill, J., Sandler, J., Read, M., Robinson, S., ... Turbill, E. (2009). Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135(5), 580-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

@article{8ce81d64eec24070b7d6beac938f2448,

title = "Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile",

abstract = "Introduction: The aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness. Methods: Silhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness. Results: Early orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P",

keywords = "Child, Dentition, Mixed, Esthetics, Dental, anatomy & histology: Face, Female, Humans, Linear Models, Male, therapy: Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Orthodontic Appliances, Functional, instrumentation: Orthodontics, Interceptive, Peer Group, Self Concept, Treatment Outcome",

author = "Kevin O'Brien and Tatiana Macfarlane and Jean Wright and Frances Conboy and Priscilla Appelbe and David Birnie and Stephen Chadwick and Ivan Connolly and Mark Hammond and Nigel Harradine and David Lewis and Simon Littlewood and Catherine McDade and Laura Mitchell and Alison Murray and Julian O'Neill and Jonathan Sandler and Micheal Read and Stephen Robinson and Iain Shaw and Elizabeth Turbill",

note = "G9410454, Medical Research Council, United Kingdom",

year = "2009",

month = may,

doi = "10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020",

language = "English",

volume = "135",

pages = "580--585",

journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",

issn = "0889-5406",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "5",

}

O'Brien, K, Macfarlane, T, Wright, J, Conboy, F, Appelbe, P, Birnie, D, Chadwick, S, Connolly, I, Hammond, M, Harradine, N, Lewis, D, Littlewood, S, McDade, C, Mitchell, L, Murray, A, O'Neill, J, Sandler, J, Read, M, Robinson, S, Shaw, I & Turbill, E 2009, 'Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile', American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 580-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile

AU - O'Brien, Kevin

AU - Macfarlane, Tatiana

AU - Wright, Jean

AU - Conboy, Frances

AU - Appelbe, Priscilla

AU - Birnie, David

AU - Chadwick, Stephen

AU - Connolly, Ivan

AU - Hammond, Mark

AU - Harradine, Nigel

AU - Lewis, David

AU - Littlewood, Simon

AU - McDade, Catherine

AU - Mitchell, Laura

AU - Murray, Alison

AU - O'Neill, Julian

AU - Sandler, Jonathan

AU - Read, Micheal

AU - Robinson, Stephen

AU - Shaw, Iain

AU - Turbill, Elizabeth

N1 - G9410454, Medical Research Council, United Kingdom

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Introduction: The aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness. Methods: Silhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness. Results: Early orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P

AB - Introduction: The aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness. Methods: Silhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness. Results: Early orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P

KW - Child

KW - Dentition, Mixed

KW - Esthetics, Dental

KW - anatomy & histology: Face

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Linear Models

KW - Male

KW - therapy: Malocclusion, Angle Class II

KW - Orthodontic Appliances, Functional

KW - instrumentation: Orthodontics, Interceptive

KW - Peer Group

KW - Self Concept

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 19409340

SN - 0889-5406

VL - 135

SP - 580

EP - 585

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

IS - 5

ER -

Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this