Eco-efficient butanol separation in the ABE fermentation process

Iulian Patraşcu, Costin Sorin Bîldea, Anton A. Kiss*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2939 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Butanol is considered a superior biofuel, as it is more energy dense and less hygroscopic than the more popular ethanol, resulting in higher possible blending ratios with gasoline. However, the production cost of the acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation process is still high, mainly due to the low butanol titer, yield and productivity in bioprocesses. The conventional recovery by distillation is an energy-intensive process that has largely restricted the economic production of biobutanol. Other methods based on gas stripping, liquid-liquid extraction, adsorption, and membranes are also energy intensive due to the bulk removal of water. This work proposes a new process for the butanol recovery by enhanced distillation (e.g. dividing-wall column technology) using only few operating units in an optimized sequence to reduce overall costs. A plant capacity of 40 ktpy butanol is considered and purities of 99.4 wt% butanol, 99.4 wt% acetone and 91.4 wt% ethanol. The complete downstream processing was rigorously simulated and optimized using Aspen Plus. The enhanced process is effective in terms of eco-efficiency (1.24 kWh/kg butanol, significant lower costs and emissions) and can be readily employed at large scale to improve the economics of biobutanol production.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)49-61
    Number of pages13
    JournalSeparation and Purification Technology
    Volume177
    Early online date23 Dec 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Distillation
    • Dividing-wall column
    • Downstream processing
    • Optimal design
    • Process control

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Eco-efficient butanol separation in the ABE fermentation process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this