Economic Inequality and the Spatial Distribution of Stop and Search: Evidence from London

Joel Suss, Thiago Oliveira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We analyse the spatial concentration of stop and search (S&S) practices. Previous work argues that the persistent reliance on S&S, despite weak to null deterrent effects on crime, results from a social order maintenance motivation on the part of the police. Expanding previous studies that focused on who tends to be stopped and searched by police officers, we focus on where S&S concentrates and investigate the role of economic inequality. We use data from London in 2019 and demonstrate that a novel measure of salient, spatially granular economic inequality is positively associated with S&S incidence at a small spatial scale, even when controlling for crime rates and other important variables. Police officers more frequently stop and search members of the public in places where the well-off and the economically precarious co-exist. Implications for understanding S&S as a tool that distinguishes between citizens, between those to protect and potential criminals, are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)828
Number of pages847
JournalThe British Journal of Criminology
Volume63
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic Inequality and the Spatial Distribution of Stop and Search: Evidence from London'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this