Effect of more vs less frequent follow-up testing on overall and colorectal cancer–Specific mortality in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer the COLOFOL randomized clinical trial

Peer Wille-Jørgensen, Ingvar Syk, Kenneth Smedh, Søren Laurberg, Dennis T. Nielsen, Sune H. Petersen, Andrew G. Renehan, Erzsébet Horváth-Puho, Lars Påhlman, Henrik T. Sørensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

151 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Intensive follow-up of patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is common in clinical practice, but evidence of a survival benefit is limited. OBJECTIVE To examine overall mortality, colorectal cancer–specific mortality, and colorectal cancer–specific recurrence rates among patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer who were randomized after curative surgery to 2 alternative schedules for follow-up testing with computed tomography and carcinoembryonic antigen. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Unblinded randomized trial including 2509 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer treated at 24 centers in Sweden, Denmark, and Uruguay from January 2006 through December 2010 and followed up for 5 years; follow-up ended on December 31, 2015. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized either to follow-up testing with computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen and serum carcinoembryonic antigen at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after surgery (high-frequency group; n = 1253 patients) or at 12 and 36 months after surgery (low-frequency group; n = 1256 patients). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were 5-year overall mortality and colorectal cancer–specific mortality rates. The secondary outcome was the colorectal cancer–specific recurrence rate. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS Among 2555 patients who were randomized, 2509 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean age, 63.5 years; 1128 women [45%]) and 2365 (94.3%) completed the trial. The 5-year overall patient mortality rate in the high-frequency group was 13.0% (161/1253) compared with 14.1% (174/1256) in the low-frequency group (risk difference 1.1% [95% CI, −1.6% to 3.8%]; P = .43). The 5-year colorectal cancer–specific mortality rate in the high-frequency group was 10.6% (128/1248) compared with 11.4% (137/1250) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 0.8% [95% CI, −1.7% to 3.3%]; P = .52). The colorectal cancer–specific recurrence rate was 21.6% (265/1248) in the high-frequency group compared with 19.4% (238/1250) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, −1.0% to 5.4%]; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer, follow-u testing with computed tomography and carcinoembryonic antigen more frequently compared with less frequently did not result in a significant rate reduction in 5-year overall mortality or colorectal cancer–specific mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2095-2103
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume319
Issue number20
Early online date22 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 May 2018

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aftercare/methods
  • Aged
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood
  • Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intention to Treat Analysis
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mortality
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of more vs less frequent follow-up testing on overall and colorectal cancer–Specific mortality in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer the COLOFOL randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this