Effects of soft-segment prepolymer functionality on structure-property relations in RIM copolyurethanes

John L. Stanford, Richard H. Still, Arthur N. Wilkinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Segmented copolyurethanes comprising 40-60% by weight of polyurethane hard segments (HS) and polyether soft-segment (SS) with different functionalities (SS-fn), have been formed by reaction injection moulding (RIM). The HS were formed from 4,4′ diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) reacted with ethane diol (ED). The three SS-prepolymers used were all hydroxyl-functionalised poly(oxypropylene-b-oxyethylene)s with different nominal functionalities (fn) of 2, 3 and 4 but with a constant molar mass per functional group of ·2000 g mol-1. RIM materials were characterised using differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, tensile stress-strain and single-edge notch fracture studies. Predictions using a statistical model of the RIM-copolymerisation showed that increasing SS-fn lead to more rapid development of copolymer molar mass with isocyanate conversion. Experimentally, the RIM-PU exhibited a wide range of mechanical behaviour resulting from differences in molecular and morphological structures. Increasing SS-fn produced materials with improved mould release behaviour and fracture resistance. However, increasing SS-fn also reduced the degree of phase separation developed in the copolyurethanes, resulting in increased modulus-temperature dependence and poorer tensile properties. ©2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3985-3994
    Number of pages9
    JournalPolymer
    Volume44
    Issue number14
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Jun 2003

    Keywords

    • Phase separation
    • Polyurethanes
    • Reaction injection moulding

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of soft-segment prepolymer functionality on structure-property relations in RIM copolyurethanes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this