Efficacy and safety of tiotropium Respimat SMI in COPD in two 1-year randomized studies.

Eric Bateman, Dave Singh, David Smith, Bernd Disse, Lesley Towse, Dan Massey, Jon Blatchford, Demetri Pavia, Rick Hodder

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Two 1-year studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tiotropium 5 or 10 microg versus placebo, inhaled via the Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI). The two studies were combined and had 4 co-primary endpoints (trough FEV(1) response, Mahler Transition Dyspnea Index [TDI] and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores all at week 48, and COPD exacerbations per patient-year). A total of 1990 patients with COPD participated (mean FEV(1): 1.09 L). The mean trough FEV(1) response of tiotropium 5 or 10 microg relative to placebo was 127 or 150 mL, respectively (both P <0.0001). The COPD exacerbation rate was significantly lower with tiotropium 5 microg (RR = 0.78; P = 0.002) and tiotropium 10 microg (RR = 0.73; P = 0.0008); the health-related quality of life and Mahler TDI co-primary endpoints were significantly improved with both doses (both P <0.0001). Adverse events were generally balanced except anticholinergic class effects, which were more frequent with active treatment. Fatal events occurred in 2.4% (5 microg), 2.7% (10 microg), and 1.6% (placebo) of patients; these differences were not significant. Tiotropium Respimat SMI 5 microg demonstrated sustained improvements in patients with COPD relative to placebo and similar to the 10 microg dose but with a lower frequency of anticholinergic adverse events.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)197-208
    Number of pages11
    JournalInternational Journal of COPD
    Volume5
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • COPD
    • FEV1
    • Respimat®
    • exacerbations
    • quality of life
    • tiotropium

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of tiotropium Respimat SMI in COPD in two 1-year randomized studies.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this