Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy of three screening instruments in the identification of autistic-spectrum disorders

  • Tony Charman
  • , Gillian Baird
  • , Emily Simonoff
  • , Tom Loucas
  • , Susie Chandler
  • , David Meldrum
  • , Andrew Pickles

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Screening instruments for autistic-spectrum disorders have not been compared in the same sample. Aims: To compare the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC). Method: Screen and diagnostic assessments on 119 children between 9 and 13 years of age with special educational needs with and without autistic-spectrum disorders were weighted to estimate screen characteristics for a realistic target population. Results: The SCQ performed best (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.90; sensitivity 0.86; specificity 0.78). The SRS had a lower AUC (0.77) with high sensitivity (0.78) and moderate specificity (0.67). The CCC had a high sensitivity but lower specificity (AUC=0.79; sensitivity 0.93; specificity 0.46). The AUC ofthe SRS and CCC was lower for children with IQ <70. Behaviour problems reduced specificity for all three instruments. Conclusions: The SCQ, SRS and CCC showed strong to moderate ability to identify autistic-spectrum disorder in this at-risk sample of school-age children with special educational needs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)554-559
    Number of pages5
    JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
    Volume191
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
      SDG 4 Quality Education

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of three screening instruments in the identification of autistic-spectrum disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this