Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses for bandage use after photorefractive keratectomy

A. Plaka, M. A. Grentzelos, N. I. Astyrakakis, G. D. Kymionis, I. G. Pallikaris, S. Plainis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of two silicone hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses, approved for continuous wear for one week, following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: Forty seven myopic patients (94 eyes) undergone bilateral PRK were enrolled in this prospective, double-masked, comparative study. One eye of each patient was fitted with a Lotrafilcon B lens (Ciba Vision, Duluth, US; 30-day recommended replacement) whereas the fellow eye was fitted with an Asmofilcon A lens (Menicon, Nagoya, Japan; 14-day recommended replacement). Epithelial defect size was assessed using slit lamp biomicroscopy on the day of surgery and at days 1-4 post-operatively. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity and retinal straylight (C-Quant, Oculus Optigerate, Germany) were evaluated pre-operatively and one month post-operatively. Results: Average epithelial defect size for Asmofilcon A and Lotrafilcon B was 25.5±11.0mm2 vs. 27.1±9.9mm2 at day 1 (p=0.007) and 6.3±7.0mm2 vs. 9.2±9.5mm2 at day 2 (p=0.012) post-operatively. Re-epithelialization at day 3 was completed in 87.2% of the eyes fitted with Asmofilcon A lenses, compared to 74.5% with Lotrafilcon B lenses (p=0.012). At the 3rd post-operative day 29.8% of re-epithelialized eyes showed irregular suture with Lotrafilcon B, compared to 12.8% eyes with Asmofilcon A lenses (p
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)243-246
    Number of pages3
    JournalContact Lens and Anterior Eye
    Volume36
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

    Keywords

    • Bandage
    • Contact lens
    • Epithelial healing
    • PRK
    • Silicone-hydrogel

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses for bandage use after photorefractive keratectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this