Elastic strains in antler trabecular bone determined by synchrotron X-ray diffraction

R. Akhtar, M. R. Daymond, J. D. Almer, P. M. Mummery

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The microstructure and associated mechanical properties of antler trabecular bone have been studied using a variety of techniques. The local trabeculae properties, as well as the three-dimensional architecture were characterized using nanoindentation and X-ray microtomography, respectively. An elastic modulus of 10.9 ± 1.1 GPa is reported for dry bone, compared with 5.4 ± 0.9 GPa for fully hydrated bone. Trabeculae thickness and separation were found to be comparable to those of bovine trabecular bone. Uniaxial compression conducted in situ during X-ray microtomography showed that antler can undergo significant architectural rearrangement, dominated by trabeculae bending and buckling, due to its low mineral content. High-energy synchrotron X-ray diffraction was used to measure elastic strains in the apatite crystals of the trabeculae, also under in situ uniaxial compression. During elastic loading, strain was found to be accommodated largely by trabeculae aligned parallel to the loading direction. Prior to the macroscopic yield point, internal strains increased as trabeculae deformed by bending, and load was also found to be redistributed to trabeculae aligned non-parallel to the loading direction. Significant bending of trabecular walls resulted in tensile strains developing in trabeculae aligned along the loading direction. © 2008 Acta Materialia Inc.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1677-1687
    Number of pages10
    JournalActa Biomaterialia
    Volume4
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

    Keywords

    • Antler
    • Apatite strains
    • Compression
    • Synchrotron X-ray diffraction
    • Trabecular bone

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Elastic strains in antler trabecular bone determined by synchrotron X-ray diffraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this