Abstract
Hexavalent Chromium has been successfully employed for corrosion protection purposes in aerospace coatings for decades. However, legislation will restrict the use of Cr6+ in the future and therefore the aerospace sector needs to identify alternative environmentally friendly coatings for corrosion protection. Before implementation of newly developed systems into actual components is possible, rigorous and time-consuming testing practices are required to ensure the new systems can achieve the strict aerospace standards requirements. The emerging number of coating systems being developed, and the vast research conducted on the subject worldwide, make the selection of suitable replacements for industrial application challenging. In this work, differently pretreated aluminium AA2024 alloy surfaces are coated with conventional Cr6+ containing coating and compared to a number of industrial alternative coatings. Corrosion performance is assessed by real-time imaging while immersed, by EIS, and by standardised salt-spray tests. Results reveal that the performance ranking acquired by salt-spray tests (SST) can be readily replaced by short-term immersion tests, and the time to failure in SST can be estimated from key corrosion indicators arising from EIS measurements at specific immersion times.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Surface and Interface Analysis |
Early online date | 7 Jan 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |