TY - GEN
T1 - Embedding Circularity Assessments in Building Projects’ Frontend Decision-Making:
T2 - Making a Compelling Behaviour Change Case
AU - Abadi, M.
AU - Moore, D.R.
AU - Mohandes, S.R.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The circular economy (CE) paradigm has helped the building sector reduce its environmental impacts. However, existing circularity assessment (CA) frameworks have not assisted practitioners making circular decisions to ‘design out waste’ at the project frontend. A pioneering framework for CA in construction, including twelve circularity indicators (CIs), is presented. A state-of-the-art case study is used to validate an AHP decision-making model based on the proposed framework to inform circular design proposal selection. The model allowed circular comparisons, while granularity of decision-making against CIs informed circularity improvements in the selected proposal. However, participants showed patterns of impeding behaviours due to the fragmentation of project roles and confusion with other sustainability metrics. This suggests the transition to CE requires a compelling behaviour change case. The model also helps establish clear conceptual contours between different pathways to sustainability. Future research will integrate CIs within the wider landscape of building sustainability certification systems. © 2024, The Authors. All rights reserved.
AB - The circular economy (CE) paradigm has helped the building sector reduce its environmental impacts. However, existing circularity assessment (CA) frameworks have not assisted practitioners making circular decisions to ‘design out waste’ at the project frontend. A pioneering framework for CA in construction, including twelve circularity indicators (CIs), is presented. A state-of-the-art case study is used to validate an AHP decision-making model based on the proposed framework to inform circular design proposal selection. The model allowed circular comparisons, while granularity of decision-making against CIs informed circularity improvements in the selected proposal. However, participants showed patterns of impeding behaviours due to the fragmentation of project roles and confusion with other sustainability metrics. This suggests the transition to CE requires a compelling behaviour change case. The model also helps establish clear conceptual contours between different pathways to sustainability. Future research will integrate CIs within the wider landscape of building sustainability certification systems. © 2024, The Authors. All rights reserved.
KW - analytic hierarchy process
KW - circularity assessment
KW - circularity indicators
KW - construction circular economy
KW - frontend circular decision-making
KW - multiple-criteria decision-making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85184093219&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.4710284
DO - 10.2139/ssrn.4710284
M3 - Other contribution
ER -