Emergency hormonal contraception: The community pharmacy perspective

E. M. Seston, K. Holden, J. Cantrill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective. To explore the views of community pharmacists in the North West of England towards the deregulation of emergency hormonal contraception (EHC) and to examine their support and training needs. Design. Two focus group discussions. Subjects. Fourteen community pharmacists, of whom eight were currently participating in a scheme to supply EHC free of charge through a patient group direction (PGD). Results. A number of themes emerged from the discussions, which appeared to influence participants' views towards the use of EHC and towards deregulation. A number of participants appeared to lack detailed knowledge about the mode of action of EHC and misunderstandings about this, coupled with erroneously held beliefs about the adverse effects of the drug, appeared to influence their attitudes to deregulation. Participants identified risks associated with pharmacy supply of EHC, both to women and to themselves, in the form of litigation. EHC was accorded a special status which seemed to go beyond its pharmacological properties and risk-benefit profile. A key and recurring theme was abuse, an ill-defined concept which appeared to refer to multiple or repeated use. It is interesting to note that none of those participants supplying EHC under a PGD could provide any examples of such abuse from their own experience. Conclusions. This small-scale study provides useful insights into the attitudes of these pharmacists towards EHC, the impact of increased availability of the drug, and the type of women who they believed would use EHC.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)203-208
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care
    Volume27
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency hormonal contraception: The community pharmacy perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this