Enron, WorldCom, Andersen et al.: A challenge to modernity

Jeffrey Unerman, Brendan O'Dwyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper uses the lens of Anthony Giddens' theories regarding the mechanisms which sustain late-modernist societies [The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1990; Modernity and Self-Identity, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991] to analyse the 2001 and 2002 accounting and audit failures at Enron, WorldCom and Andersen. Assessments of risk and trust play a central role in Giddens' model, and this paper traces an escalating withdrawal of trust in systems of audit and accounting, and related increased perceptions of risk in corporate investment instruments. It also analyses regulatory responses aimed at sustaining or regaining public trust, and argues that failure to sustain such trust risks compromising the continued momentum of late modernity and the interests of people who benefit from institutions of late modernity. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)971-993
Number of pages22
JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
Volume15
Issue number6-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004

Keywords

  • Andersen
  • Enron
  • Giddens' mechanisms of modernity
  • Trust in accounting and audit
  • WorldCom

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enron, WorldCom, Andersen et al.: A challenge to modernity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this