Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial

Martin Eden; A Avery; S Rodgers; D Kendrick; A Sheikh

Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial

Martin Eden
, A Avery
, S Rodgers
, D Kendrick
, A Sheikh

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	60-61
Journal	International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume	18
Issue number	S2
Publication status	Published - 2010

Cite this

Eden, M., Avery, A., Rodgers, S., Kendrick, D., & Sheikh, A. (2010). Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 18(S2), 60-61.

Eden, Martin ; Avery, A ; Rodgers, S et al. / Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial. In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2010 ; Vol. 18, No. S2. pp. 60-61.

@article{3c293305854b491a8e88690506f4392a,

title = "Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial",

author = "Martin Eden and A Avery and S Rodgers and D Kendrick and A Sheikh",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "60--61",

journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",

issn = "2042-7174",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons Ltd",

number = "S2",

}

Eden, M, Avery, A, Rodgers, S, Kendrick, D & Sheikh, A 2010, 'Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial', International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, vol. 18, no. S2, pp. 60-61.

Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial. / Eden, Martin; Avery, A; Rodgers, S et al.
In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 18, No. S2, 2010, p. 60-61.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial

AU - Eden, Martin

AU - Avery, A

AU - Rodgers, S

AU - Kendrick, D

AU - Sheikh, A

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

M3 - Article

SN - 2042-7174

VL - 18

SP - 60

EP - 61

JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

IS - S2

ER -

Eden M, Avery A, Rodgers S, Kendrick D, Sheikh A. Ensuring accuracy in routinely collected data in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led IT-based intervention with simple feedback in reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management: the PINCER trial. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2010;18(S2):60-61.