Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect

Stephen Jay, Carys Jones, Paul Slinn, Christopher Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The widespread experience of environmental impact assessment (EIA) as an anticipatory environmental management tool has generated a considerable debate over the extent to which it is achieving its purposes. This has been measured in terms of EIA 'effectiveness', especially as discussion has moved away from issues of procedural implementation, to the more substantive goals of EIA and its place within broader decision-making contexts. Empirical studies have revealed the relatively weak degree of influence on planning decisions that is being exerted by EIA, which is increasingly being attributed to its rationalist beginnings. This article seeks to direct this debate towards the founding political purposes of EIA which, it is argued, provide a neglected, yet strong, basis for EIA reform. A number of illustrative suggestions are made as a result of this redirection, to enable EIA to adopt a more determinative role in decision making and to contribute to more sustainable patterns of development planning. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-300
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Keywords

  • Effectiveness
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Founding purposes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this