TY - JOUR
T1 - Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Mucopolysaccharidoses: Opinions of Patients and Families
AU - Coman, David J.
AU - Hayes, Ian M.
AU - Collins, Veronica
AU - Sahhar, Margaret
AU - Wraith, J. Ed
AU - Delatycki, Martin B.
PY - 2008/5
Y1 - 2008/5
N2 - Objectives: To assess the opinions of individuals with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) and their parents regarding the use of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Study design: A validated questionnaire, including hypothetical clinical scenarios about ERT for MPS, was distributed to members of MPS support groups in the United States and Australia. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 249 MPS support group members. Overall, 92% were in favor of ERT where MPS causes severe physical problems but does not affect intellect, and 69% were in favor of ERT where the physical limitations are mild and intellect is spared. Only 47% were in favor of ERT where severe physical and intellectual problems are well established; however, 77% were in favor of ERT in this situation if treatment begun early prolongs life and improves quality of life. Conclusion: Most respondents were in favor of ERT for MPS, even where it would not alter the intellectual deterioration. The medical community has a responsibility to advocate for their patients in situations where ERT is appropriate and recognize the economic burden and "family function burden" ERT can incur. © 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - Objectives: To assess the opinions of individuals with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) and their parents regarding the use of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Study design: A validated questionnaire, including hypothetical clinical scenarios about ERT for MPS, was distributed to members of MPS support groups in the United States and Australia. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 249 MPS support group members. Overall, 92% were in favor of ERT where MPS causes severe physical problems but does not affect intellect, and 69% were in favor of ERT where the physical limitations are mild and intellect is spared. Only 47% were in favor of ERT where severe physical and intellectual problems are well established; however, 77% were in favor of ERT in this situation if treatment begun early prolongs life and improves quality of life. Conclusion: Most respondents were in favor of ERT for MPS, even where it would not alter the intellectual deterioration. The medical community has a responsibility to advocate for their patients in situations where ERT is appropriate and recognize the economic burden and "family function burden" ERT can incur. © 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.10.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.10.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 18410781
SN - 0022-3476
VL - 152
SP - 723
EP - 727
JO - Journal Of Pediatrics
JF - Journal Of Pediatrics
IS - 5
ER -