Epistolary Strategies of Negotiation: Reading a Fraternal Dispute at the Mughal Court, 1593–1594

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines a dispute between the Mughal emperor Akbar and his foster brother Mirzā ʿ⁠Azīz Koka in the late sixteenth century through a study of two epistolary compositions (inshāʾ) – a royal mandate (farmān) issued by Akbar and a petition (ʿ⁠arẓ-dāsht) from the mirzā in response. By focusing on the language of negotiation in these letters, I argue that epistolary practices were critical for reconfiguring kinship bonds, imperial service, and courtly disposition that were central to the rupture in fraternal and courtly relations. Letters served as the discursive site to reiterate norms of courtly comportment, register complaints against controversial actions, express emotions, and record reactions to exigent situations. Finally, the correspondence reveals the ways in which the complex dynamics of a court society were deeply intertwined with global power contestations and could have far-reaching implications on the imperial competition between early modern Islamic empires.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)521-554
Number of pages34
JournalMedieval Encounters
Volume29
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2023

Keywords

  • farmān
  • ⁠arẓ-dāsht
  • epistolary correspondence
  • imperial service
  • kinship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epistolary Strategies of Negotiation: Reading a Fraternal Dispute at the Mughal Court, 1593–1594'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this