Estimating from cross-sectional categorical data subject to misclassification and double sampling: Moment-based, maximum likelihood and quasi-likelihood approaches

Nikolaos Tzavidis, Nikos Tzavidis, Yan Xia Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We discuss alternative approaches for estimating from cross-sectional categorical data in the presence of misclassification. Two parameterisations of the misclassification model are reviewed. The first employs misclassification probabilities and leads to moment-based inference. The second employs calibration probabilities and leads to maximum likelihood inference. We show that maximum likelihood estimation can be alternatively performed by employing misclassification probabilities and a missing data specification. As an alternative to maximum likelihood estimation we propose a quasi-likelihood parameterisation of the misclassification model. In this context an explicit definition of the likelihood function is avoided and a different way of resolving a missing data problem is provided. Variance estimation for the alternative point estimators is considered. The different approaches are illustrated using real data from the UK Labour Force Survey and simulated data. Copyright © 2006 N. Tzavidis & Y.X. Lin.
Original languageEnglish
Article number42030
JournalJournal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences
Volume2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating from cross-sectional categorical data subject to misclassification and double sampling: Moment-based, maximum likelihood and quasi-likelihood approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this