Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up

Graham Dunn, Mohammad Maracy, Christopher Dowrick, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Odd Steffen Dalgard, Helen Page, Ville Lehtinen, Patricia Casey, Clare Wilkinson, José Luis Vázquez-Barquero, Greg Wilkinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: The Outcomes of Depression International Network (ODIN) trial evaluated the effect of two psychological interventions for the treatment of depression in primary care. Only about half of the patients in the treatment arm complied with the offer of treatment, prompting the question: 'what was the effect of treatment in those patients who actually received it?' Aims To illustrate the estimation of the effect of receipt of treatment in a randomised controlled trial subject to non-compliance and loss to follow-up. Method: We estimated the compiler average causal effect (CACE) of treatment. Results: In the ODIN trial the effect of receipt of psychological intervention (an average of about 4 points on the Beck Depression Inventory) is about twice that of offering it. Conclusions: The statistical analysis of the results of a clinical trial subject to non-compliance to allocated treatment is now reasonably straightforward through estimation of a CACE and investigators should be encouraged to present the results of analyses of this type as a routine component of a trial report.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)323-331
    Number of pages8
    JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
    Volume183
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2003

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this