Estimating the private benefits of vaccination against cholera in Beira, Mozambique: A travel cost approach

Marc Jeuland, Marcelino Lucas, John Clemens, Dale Whittington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reports the results of the first study that estimates households' private demand for cholera vaccines using the travel cost method. We take advantage of an unusual natural experiment. In January 2004, more than 41,000 residents from various locations in Beira, Mozambique received two doses of oral cholera vaccine free of charge during the first vaccination trial to test its effectiveness in an endemic cholera zone of Africa. About 30,000 people participated from outside the target zone, resulting in long queues and an average waiting time of about 85 min per dose. We estimated travel cost models of the revealed demand for cholera vaccines among households informed of the trial using information collected in in-person interviews conducted during the summer of 2005. To explore households' participation in the trial, we used standard and zero-inflated household count models for all household members and dichotomous choice models for the head of the household. Our analysis shows that the quantity of vaccines obtained by households and the likelihood of participation decreased as travel cost-in time and transport expenses-rose. Our best estimates of per capita willingness to pay for the two required doses of cholera vaccine are about 0.85 USD. These estimates are sensitive to the assumed value of time spent acquiring vaccines. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-322
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Development Economics
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Cholera
  • Mozambique
  • Travel cost
  • Vaccine demand
  • Willingness to pay

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating the private benefits of vaccination against cholera in Beira, Mozambique: A travel cost approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this