Estimation of an indicator of the representativeness of survey response

Natalie Shlomo, Chris Skinner, Barry Schouten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Nonresponse is a major source of estimation error in sample surveys. The response rate is widely used to measure survey quality associated with nonresponse, but is inadequate as an indicator because of its limited relation with nonresponse bias. Schouten et al. (2009) proposed an alternative indicator, which they refer to as an indicator of representativeness or R-indicator. This indicator measures the variability of the probabilities of response for units in the population. This paper develops methods for the estimation of this R-indicator assuming that values of a set of auxiliary variables are observed for both respondents and nonrespondents. We propose bias adjustments to the point estimator proposed by Schouten et al. (2009) and demonstrate the effectiveness of this adjustment in a simulation study where it is shown that the method is valid, especially for smaller sample sizes. We also propose linearization variance estimators which avoid the need for computer-intensive replication methods and show good coverage in the simulation study even when models are not fully specified. The use of the proposed procedures is also illustrated in an application to two business surveys at Statistics Netherlands. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-211
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Volume142
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Nonresponse
  • Quality
  • Representative
  • Response propensity
  • Sample survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of an indicator of the representativeness of survey response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this