Ethical and scientific decision making in distraction osteogenesis

W. C. Shaw, N. A. Mandall, C. R. Mattick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: To propose a prospective registry for distraction osteogenesis research. Results: The search strategy identified 82 reports, of which 11 were review articles, 17 were animal studies, 5 were theoretical models, and 49 were case reports/series. Conclusions: So far, the literature concerning distraction osteogenesis does not allow reliable choices to be made on the most appropriate form of distraction osteogenesis in different clinical decisions or whether it is superior to osteotomy or nontreatment. A prospective registry is proposed to hasten critical appraisal of distraction osteogenesis.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)641-645
    Number of pages4
    JournalCleft Palate-craniofacial Journal
    Volume39
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2002

    Keywords

    • Clinical trials
    • Distraction osteogenesis
    • Outcomes
    • Registry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical and scientific decision making in distraction osteogenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this