Eukaryotic selenocysteine incorporation follows a nonprocessive mechanism that competes with translational termination

John Mccarthy, Muhammad Talat Nasim, Susanne Jaenecke, Ali Belduz, Heike Kollmus, Leopold Flohé, J. E G McCarthy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The synthesis of eukaryotic selenoproteins involves the recoding of an internal UGA codon as a site for selenocysteine incorporation. This recoding event is directed by a selenocysteine insertion sequence in the 3'- untranslated region. Because UGA also functions as a signal for peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, we have investigated how the rates of translational termination and selenocysteine incorporation relate to cis-acting elements in the mRNA as well as to trans-acting factors in the cytoplasm. We used cis-elements from the phospholipid glutathione peroxidase gene as the basis for this work because of its relatively high efficiency of selenocysteine incorporation. The last two codons preceding the UGA were found to exert a far greater influence on selenocysteine incorporation than nucleotides downstream of it. The efficiency of selenocysteine incorporation was generally much less than 100% but could be partially enhanced by concomitant overexpression of the tRNA(Sec) gene. The combination of two or three UGA codons in one reading frame led to a dramatic reduction in the yield of full-length protein. It is therefore unlikely that multiple incorporations of selenocysteine are processive with respect to the mode of action of the ribosomal complex binding to the UGA site. These observations are discussed in terms of the mechanism of selenoprotein synthesis and its ability to compete with termination at UGA codons.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)14846-14852
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Biological Chemistry
    Volume275
    Issue number20
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Eukaryotic selenocysteine incorporation follows a nonprocessive mechanism that competes with translational termination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this