Abstract
This article contains a reprisal of the established law on euthanasia, assisted suicide and end of life care. The circumstances of the Gard case are then considered, as well as the lessons which can be learnt, from the public response to the litigation, about debates around emotive issues connected to life
and death. This piece will conclude with some overarching reflections on constitutional matters raised by the analysis of these legal and social questions.
and death. This piece will conclude with some overarching reflections on constitutional matters raised by the analysis of these legal and social questions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 119-130 |
Journal | Derecho y Religión |
Publication status | Published - 10 Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- Euthanasia
- assisted dying
- Parliament
- Judicary
- Charlie Gard