Evaluation of robotics in surgery: Clinical need and efficacy

Michael O'Toole, O Tosun (Editor), H L Akin (Editor), M O Tokhi (Editor), G S Virk (Editor)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    Surgical robotic systems have the potential to facilitate and increase the efficiency of surgical procedures, and improve patient outcomes. However, the up-take of this technology has been poor despite considerable research activity and the existence of several available commercial systems. In this paper, the reasons for poor up-take are examined by evaluating the clinical evidence base for several commercial surgical robotic systems. In particular, clinical need and efficacy are assessed. It is argued that a low quality evidence base and inability to prove an advantageous cost-to benefit ratio are the major inhibitors to wide-spread adoption of current surgical robotic systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMobile Robotics - Solutions and Challenges
    Subtitle of host publicationSolutions and Challenges - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, CLAWAR 2009
    EditorsO Tosun, H L Akin, M O Tokhi, G S Virk
    PublisherWorld Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd
    Pages233-241
    Number of pages9
    ISBN (Print)978-981-4291-27-9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2010
    EventThe Twelfth International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots (CLAWAR) and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines - Istanbul, Turkey
    Duration: 9 Sept 200911 Sept 2009

    Conference

    ConferenceThe Twelfth International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots (CLAWAR) and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines
    CityIstanbul, Turkey
    Period9/09/0911/09/09

    Keywords

    • Biomedical and Personal Robotic Assistance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of robotics in surgery: Clinical need and efficacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this