Abstract
Based on empirical evidence and conceptual scoping, this article builds a typology of everyday social practices in a deeply divided society. The typology distinguishes between moderating and non-moderating practices relating to boundaries. Based on a case study of contemporary Lebanon, it describes how boundary making and maintaining are the stuff of everyday life in deeply divided societies. But it also describes how the society under study also contains much evidence of fluidity and permeability in relation to boundaries. Many of these instances of boundary crossing do not threaten the meta politico-religious boundary, but they do compel us to re-evaluate views of deeply divided societies as comprised of homogenous and uncompromising blocs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4-25 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Civil Wars |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 26 Jul 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute