Abstract
The evidential reasoning (ER) approach was developed to support multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). It is based on the Dampster's combination rule for criteria aggregation and belief function for treating ignorance. In the original ER approach, however, alternative ranking depends on the accurate estimation of a value function, which may be difficult in certain decision environments. In this paper, the link and difference between the ER algorithm and Dampster's combination rule are analysed first. A new alternative ranking method is then investigated as an integrated part of the enhanced ER approach. © 2011 IEEE.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | IEEE SSCI 2011 - Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence - CICA 2011 - 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Control and Automation|IEEE SSCI - Symp. Ser. Comput. Intell. - CICA - IEEE Symp. Comput. Intell. Control Autom. |
Pages | 131-136 |
Number of pages | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Event | Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, IEEE SSCI 2011 - 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Control and Automation, CICA 2011 - Paris Duration: 1 Jul 2011 → … |
Conference
Conference | Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, IEEE SSCI 2011 - 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Control and Automation, CICA 2011 |
---|---|
City | Paris |
Period | 1/07/11 → … |
Keywords
- Evidential Reasoning approach
- IDS
- Intelligent Decision System
- multiple criteria decision analysis
- uncertainty