Evidence for mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    A reanalysis of existing data suggests that the established tenet of increasing efficiency of transport with body size in terrestrial locomotion requires re-evaluation. Here, the statistical model that described the data best indicated a dichotomy between the data for small (1 kg). Within and between these two size groups there was no detectable difference in the scaling exponents (slopes) relating metabolic (Emet) and mechanical costs (Emech,CM) of locomotion to body mass (Mb). Therefore, no scaling of efficiency (Emech,CM /Emet) with Mb was evident within each size group. Small animals, however, appeared to be generally less efficient than larger animals (7% and 26% respectively). Consequently, it is possible that the relationship between efficiency and Mb is not continuous, but, rather, involves a step-change. This step-change in the efficiency of locomotion mirrors previous findings suggesting a postural cause for an apparent size dichotomy in the relationship between Emet and Mb. Currently data for Emech,CM is lacking, but the relationship between efficiency in terrestrial locomotion and Mb is likely to be determined by posture and kinematics rather than body size alone. Hence, scaling of efficiency is likely to be more complex than a simple linear relationship across body sizes. A homogenous study of the mechanical cost of terrestrial locomotion across a broad range of species, body sizes, and importantly locomotor postures is a priority for future research. © 2009 Nudds et al.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere6927
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Issue number9
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Sept 2009


    Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this