Projects per year
Abstract
I rehearse two issues around the commentary of Whigham and colleagues. (1) There really are many more reasons than those given as to why natural evolution cannot reasonably find or select the ‘optimal’ individual. (2) A series of experimental molecular biology programmes, known generically as directed evolution, can use operators and selection schemes that natural evolution cannot. When developed further using the methods of synthetic biology, there are no operators or schemes for in silico evolution that cannot be applied precisely to directed evolution. The issues raised apply only to natural evolution but not to directed evolution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines |
Early online date | 29 Mar 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evolutionary Algorithms and Synthetic Biology for directed evolution: Commentary on “On the Mapping of Genotype to Phenotype in Evolutionary Algorithms” by Peter A. Whigham, Grant Dick, and James Maclaurin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre for Fine and Speciality Chemicals
Scrutton, N. (PI), Azapagic, A. (CoI), Balmer, A. (CoI), Barran, P. (CoI), Breitling, R. (CoI), Delneri, D. (CoI), Dixon, N. (CoI), Faulon, J.-L. (CoI), Flitsch, S. (CoI), Goble, C. (CoI), Goodacre, R. (CoI), Hay, S. (CoI), Kell, D. (CoI), Leys, D. (CoI), Lloyd, J. (CoI), Lockyer, N. (CoI), Martin, P. (CoI), Micklefield, J. (CoI), Munro, A. (CoI), Pedrosa Mendes, P. (CoI), Randles, S. (CoI), Salehi Yazdi, F. (CoI), Shapira, P. (CoI), Takano, E. (CoI), Turner, N. (CoI) & Winterburn, J. (CoI)
14/11/14 → 13/05/20
Project: Research