Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: A systematic synthesis of research methods and quality

Siobhan Reilly, Chengqlu Xie, Sally Jacobs, David Challis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article reports on a systematic synthesis of the research methods and quality of peer-reviewed empirical research relating to adult social care services (1990-2001). The range of research questions, research designs and methodological quality varied within and across four service user groups. Factors associated with variation in methodological quality included the type of research question, strategies and designs adopted, service user group, number of authors, unit of analysis and year of publication. The findings demonstrated a dearth of rigorous social care evaluations in the UK. These findings contribute to current initiatives aimed at improving the standard of health and social care research. © The Policy Press.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)155-182
    Number of pages27
    JournalEvidence and Policy
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

    Keywords

    • Methodological quality
    • Research methods
    • Social care
    • Systematic review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: A systematic synthesis of research methods and quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this