Exposure to case management: Relationships to patient characteristics and outcome. Report from the UK700 trial

Tom Burns, Ian White, Sarah Byford, Matthew Fiander, Francis Creed, Tom Fahy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Trials in community psychiatry must balance rigour with generalisability. The UK700 trial failed to find a significant effect on hospitalisation, but its sample population contained significant heterogeneity of exposure to case management in the two groups. Aims: To test whether patients successfully exposed to a minimum of 12 months' intensive case management over the 2-year follow-up period achieved reduced hospitalisation. Method: Of 679 participants with hospitalisation data, 84 were identified as having <12 months' exposure owing to prolonged hospitalisation, imprisonment or a combination of the two. These patients were excluded and outcomes tested for the remaining 595 patients. Results: Overall reduced case-load size did not reduce hospitalisation or treatment costs over 2 years despite elimination of outliers. Age, previous hospitalisation and source of recruitment to the study all correlated with outcome. Conclusions: Case-load reduction is not in itself enough to reduce the need for hospital care in psychosis. Baseline patient characteristics (in particular length of previous hospitalisation and recruitment from in-patient care) have a significant influence and should be allowed for in power calculations. Identifying the optimal clinical profile for patients likely to benefit from intensive case management remains a pressing need for further studies. Declaration of interest: None.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)236-241
    Number of pages5
    JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
    Volume181
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exposure to case management: Relationships to patient characteristics and outcome. Report from the UK700 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this