Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma: A clinicopathological study with identification of potential diagnostic mimics

Anne Marie Quinn, Fiona Blackhall, Godfrey Wilson, Sarah Danson, Andrew Clamp, Linda Ashcroft, Judith Brierley, Philip Hasleton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Aims: To evaluate the clinicopathological features of small cell carcinoma arising outside the lung. Methods and results: Thirty-seven cases with a pathology diagnosis of extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC) were selected. The clinical notes were reviewed and tumour blocks were selected for a fresh haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) section and immunohistochemical stains. The most common tumour locations were cervix and bladder. Twenty-five cases (68%) were finally diagnosed as EPSCC, nine of which were found with coexisting non small cell carcinoma. Two cases (5%) were diagnosed as large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the cervix. The remainder was classified as 10 poorly differentiated carcinomas (PDCs) (27%). Positive staining for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) was noted in nine cases of EPSCC and in none of the cases of PDC (P=0.034). Synaptophysin immunoreactivity was found in 20 cases of EPSCC and two cases of PDC with neuroendocrine differentiation (P=0.002), as well as two cases of LCNEC. 34βE12 was positive in eight cases of SCC and two cases of PDC. Conclusions: Based on this series, EPSCC may be overdiagnosed. Immunohistochemistry for TTF-1, used in combination with synaptophysin, may help to discriminate EPSCC from PDC. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)454-464
    Number of pages10
    JournalHistopathology
    Volume61
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012

    Keywords

    • 34βE12
    • Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma
    • Small cell carcinoma
    • Synaptophysin
    • TTF-1

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma: A clinicopathological study with identification of potential diagnostic mimics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this