Factors associated with change in pain and disability over time: A community-based prospective observational study of hip and knee osteoarthritis

Tim J. Peters, Caroline Sanders, Paul Dieppe, Jenny Donovan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Hip and knee osteoarthritis are frequent causes of primary care consultations. They are considered slowly progressive disorders, often resulting in severe pain or disability and the need for joint replacements. There have been few longitudinal studies of progression to inform individual prognoses in primary care. Aim: To describe the degree of progression and investigate predictors of change in hip or knee pain and disability. Design of study: Prospective community-based cohort. Setting: An age-sex stratified survey of 27 000 people registered with 40 general practices in Avon and Somerset yielded 2437 reporting hip and/or knee symptoms at baseline (1992-1994). A 25% random sample of 587 individuals was followed up between 1998 and 1999. Method: Pain or disability was measured at baseline and follow-up using the New Zealand score. For the worst joint according to the New Zealand score at baseline, hip and knee problem were analysed separately. Regression models ascertained characteristics of non-responders and factors associated with change in scores. Seven sociodemographic, seven comorbidity, and two healthcare utilisation variables were considered. Results: Generally pain and disability worsened over the 7 years, but 35% and 29% of those initially reporting hip and knee pain respectively had improved. Reporting 'other health problems' was associated with greater deterioration for both hip and knee disease, as was cardiovascular morbidity for hip disease and lower social class, being retired, hypertension, and higher body mass index for knee disease. Deteriorations in scores were strongly associated with individuals consulting their GP about joint problems. Conclusion: Osteoarthritis does not invariably deteriorate, but when It does social as well as biological factors appear to be important. These findings may aid outcome prediction. Future research on osteoarthritis should be conducted within a biopsychosocial rather than a purely biological paradigm. © British Journal of General Practice 2005.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)205-211
    Number of pages6
    JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
    Volume55
    Issue number512
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005

    Keywords

    • Disability evaluation
    • Disease progression
    • New Zealand score
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Pain
    • Projections and predictions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Factors associated with change in pain and disability over time: A community-based prospective observational study of hip and knee osteoarthritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this