TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility of a community-based cancer awareness initiative
T2 - views of those delivering and managing the intervention
AU - Mueller, Julia
AU - Parry-Harries, Emily
AU - Clough, Gary
AU - Verma, Arpana
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Macmillan Cancer Support and the Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Aim: Many people delay presenting to health services with cancer symptoms due to lack of awareness, particularly in areas of high socio-economic deprivation. A three-year community-based intervention was launched in Northwest England to improve public awareness of cancer symptoms. In this study, we aimed to evaluate this intervention by exploring the views of those involved in its management and delivery. Methods: Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with volunteers as well as members of the project management and steering group. Interviews were analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Results: Participants felt they succeeded in raising awareness, influencing behaviour, connecting with local communities and engaging with vulnerable people. Participants perceived some weaknesses in the delivery of the intervention, including limited engagement of stakeholders, particularly general practitioners (GPs), and socially excluded groups. Conclusions: Future public health interventions should pay particular attention to engagement of socially excluded individuals who do not interact with community events or groups, and to the engagement of stakeholders in early planning stages of the intervention. This should involve a specific GP engagement plan.
AB - Aim: Many people delay presenting to health services with cancer symptoms due to lack of awareness, particularly in areas of high socio-economic deprivation. A three-year community-based intervention was launched in Northwest England to improve public awareness of cancer symptoms. In this study, we aimed to evaluate this intervention by exploring the views of those involved in its management and delivery. Methods: Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with volunteers as well as members of the project management and steering group. Interviews were analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis. Results: Participants felt they succeeded in raising awareness, influencing behaviour, connecting with local communities and engaging with vulnerable people. Participants perceived some weaknesses in the delivery of the intervention, including limited engagement of stakeholders, particularly general practitioners (GPs), and socially excluded groups. Conclusions: Future public health interventions should pay particular attention to engagement of socially excluded individuals who do not interact with community events or groups, and to the engagement of stakeholders in early planning stages of the intervention. This should involve a specific GP engagement plan.
KW - Cancer
KW - Community-based
KW - Health promotion
KW - Public health
KW - Qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106425379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/611133b3-300f-3f78-882f-e3a04e9eba2b/
U2 - 10.1007/s10389-021-01581-3
DO - 10.1007/s10389-021-01581-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85106425379
SN - 2198-1833
VL - 31
SP - 765
EP - 771
JO - Journal of Public Health
JF - Journal of Public Health
IS - 5
ER -