Figured Worlds in the Field of Power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2389 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article seeks to deepen our understanding of how structural relations of power should be understood in local accounts of activity and identity. Thus, we critically review the synthesis of Bourdieu and activity theory in Figured Worlds, analyzing two critiques of Bourdieu: his insufficient localism and his overemphasis on embodiment of habitus. We are left with Bourdieu’s overwhelming concern to explain how the field of power is locally refracted and critique its doxa in a field of opinion, while arguably doing so at the expense of imagination, self-authoring, and world making. We conclude with our own suggestions of a synthesis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-257
JournalMind, Culture, and Activity
Volume24
Issue number3
Early online date24 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Figured Worlds in the Field of Power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this