Abstract
Two different grain boundary engineering processing routes for type 304 austenitic stainless steel have been compared. The processing routes involve the application of a small level of strain (5%) through either cold rolling or uni-axial tensile straining followed by high-temperature annealing. Electron backscatter diffraction and orientation mapping have been used to measure the proportions of Σ3n boundary types (in coincidence site lattice notation) and degree of random boundary break-up, in order to gain a measure of the success of the two types of grain boundary engineering treatments. The distribution of grain boundary plane crystallography has also been measured and analyzed in detail using the five-parameter stereological method. There were significant differences between the grain boundary population profiles depending on the type of deformation applied. © 2009 The Royal Microscopical Society.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 417-422 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Microscopy |
Volume | 233 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
Keywords
- Annealing twin
- EBSD
- Grain boundary engineering
- Grain boundary plane