Abstract
Constitutional reform requires a cautious approach that draws heavily on the theory of institutions. Too often arguments for particular constitutional arrangements are one-dimensional and limited in scope and imagination. This article illustrates this theme by discussing the debate over fixed- and variable-term parliaments, and by offering a somewhat novel argument that focuses on the role of the opposition within a parliamentary system. © 2010 Political Studies Association.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 18-25 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Politics |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2010 |