TY - JOUR
T1 - Follow up of people aged 65 and over with a history of emergency admissions: Analysis of routine admission data
AU - Roland, Martin
AU - Dusheiko, Mark
AU - Gravelle, Hugh
AU - Parker, Stuart
PY - 2005/2/5
Y1 - 2005/2/5
N2 - Objective: To determine the subsequent pattern of emergency admissions in older people with a history of frequent emergency admissions. Design: Analysis of routine admissions data from NHS hospitals using hospital episode statistics (HES) in England. Subjects: Individual patients aged ≥ 65, ≥ 75, and ≥ 85 who had at least two emergency admissions in 1997-8. Main outcome measures: Emergency admissions and bed use in this "high risk" cohort of patients were counted for the next five years and compared with the general population of the same age. No account was taken of mortality as the analysis was designed to estimate the future use of beds in this high risk cohort Results: Over four to five years, admission rates and bed use ih the high risk cohorts fell to the mean rate for older people. Although patients ≥ 65 with two or more such admissions were responsible for 38% of admissions in the index year, they were responsible for fewer than 10% of admissions in the following year and just over 3% five years later. Conclusion: Patients with multiple emergency admissions are often identified as a high risk group for subsequent admission and substantial claims are made for interventions designed to avoid emergency admission in such patients. Simply monitoring admission rates cannot assess interventions designed to reduce admission among frail older people as rates fall without any intervention. Comparison with a matched control group is necessary. Wider benefits than reduced admissions should be considered when introducing intensive case management of older people.
AB - Objective: To determine the subsequent pattern of emergency admissions in older people with a history of frequent emergency admissions. Design: Analysis of routine admissions data from NHS hospitals using hospital episode statistics (HES) in England. Subjects: Individual patients aged ≥ 65, ≥ 75, and ≥ 85 who had at least two emergency admissions in 1997-8. Main outcome measures: Emergency admissions and bed use in this "high risk" cohort of patients were counted for the next five years and compared with the general population of the same age. No account was taken of mortality as the analysis was designed to estimate the future use of beds in this high risk cohort Results: Over four to five years, admission rates and bed use ih the high risk cohorts fell to the mean rate for older people. Although patients ≥ 65 with two or more such admissions were responsible for 38% of admissions in the index year, they were responsible for fewer than 10% of admissions in the following year and just over 3% five years later. Conclusion: Patients with multiple emergency admissions are often identified as a high risk group for subsequent admission and substantial claims are made for interventions designed to avoid emergency admission in such patients. Simply monitoring admission rates cannot assess interventions designed to reduce admission among frail older people as rates fall without any intervention. Comparison with a matched control group is necessary. Wider benefits than reduced admissions should be considered when introducing intensive case management of older people.
U2 - 10.1136/bmj.330.7486.289
DO - 10.1136/bmj.330.7486.289
M3 - Article
VL - 330
SP - 289
EP - 292
JO - British Medical Journal
JF - British Medical Journal
SN - 0959-535X
IS - 7486
ER -