Abstract
The field of innovation policy studies is at a crossroads. It has clearly been influential. However, might it be losing the critical insight necessary to remain so in future? We discuss four dangerous tendencies seen in many innovation policy studies: idealising policy rationales and policy-makers; treating policies as tools from a toolbox; putting too much faith in coordination and intelligent design of 'policy mixes'; and taking an atemporal approach to innovation policy. Based on these we identify some ways forward that, we argue, would deal better with the complex multi-actor dynamics, fundamental uncertainties and challenges to the implementation, coordination and evaluation of policies and which would make for more relevant and impactful innovation policy studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 177-188 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Industry and Innovation |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 9 Mar 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Innovation policy
- implementation
- policy mixes
- evaluation
- co-ordination
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Manchester Institute of Innovation Research