Four dangers in innovation policy studies - and how to avoid them

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

746 Downloads (Pure)


The field of innovation policy studies is at a crossroads. It has clearly been influential. However, might it be losing the critical insight necessary to remain so in future? We discuss four dangerous tendencies seen in many innovation policy studies: idealising policy rationales and policy-makers; treating policies as tools from a toolbox; putting too much faith in coordination and intelligent design of 'policy mixes'; and taking an atemporal approach to innovation policy. Based on these we identify some ways forward that, we argue, would deal better with the complex multi-actor dynamics, fundamental uncertainties and challenges to the implementation, coordination and evaluation of policies and which would make for more relevant and impactful innovation policy studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-188
Number of pages12
JournalIndustry and Innovation
Issue number2
Early online date9 Mar 2016
Publication statusPublished - 2016


  • Innovation policy
  • implementation
  • policy mixes
  • evaluation
  • co-ordination

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Institute of Innovation Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Four dangers in innovation policy studies - and how to avoid them'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this