Abstract
Martti Koskenniemi's From Apology to Utopia is (rightly) considered a classic in international legal theory. The study tracks the oscillation of international legal argument over hundreds of years to reconcile seeming incongruencies: legal reasoning does not provide determinacy, but it brings weighted direction to political conflict; legal categories are amorphous, yet also an autonomous field of study. Though not commonly engaged, the methodological and theoretical posture of the book is significantly informed by a theory of history. This article focuses on this historical element within the text as a means to analyze some of its central claims and situate it within a broader sociology of knowledge production particular to late twentieth century legal academia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 667-676 |
| Journal | Leiden Journal of International Law |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 28 Jul 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Jul 2016 |