Abstract
This paper considers New York City’s High Line Park, a linear stretch of green
space situated on a discontinued railroad track in Manhattan. Unveiled in 2009, the High
Line has become one of the most visited tourist sites in the city, but critics have called
attention to its role in the gentrification of its surrounding neighborhoods and ties to
extensive real estate development in the region. More specifically, many critics have focused
on the project’s dramatic redesign of the site’s accidental landscape, which was a product
of decades of abandonment and spontaneous plant growth. Drawing from contemporary
literature that sees urban wastelands as sites of creative possibility, these critics have
mourned the contemporary High Line’s redesign for its rejection of a space that offered
more creative possibility. At the same time, the park’s designers themselves have argued
that the redesigned park preserves the site’s transgressive spirit through purposeful design
elements. In this paper, I analyze these conversations and consider how differing ideas
about design and accidental urban nature are being engaged with by critics of the park.
I celebrate criticisms of the park’s role in gentrification, but caution against the idea that
abandoned urban spaces offer an implicit critique to neoliberal urban governance.
space situated on a discontinued railroad track in Manhattan. Unveiled in 2009, the High
Line has become one of the most visited tourist sites in the city, but critics have called
attention to its role in the gentrification of its surrounding neighborhoods and ties to
extensive real estate development in the region. More specifically, many critics have focused
on the project’s dramatic redesign of the site’s accidental landscape, which was a product
of decades of abandonment and spontaneous plant growth. Drawing from contemporary
literature that sees urban wastelands as sites of creative possibility, these critics have
mourned the contemporary High Line’s redesign for its rejection of a space that offered
more creative possibility. At the same time, the park’s designers themselves have argued
that the redesigned park preserves the site’s transgressive spirit through purposeful design
elements. In this paper, I analyze these conversations and consider how differing ideas
about design and accidental urban nature are being engaged with by critics of the park.
I celebrate criticisms of the park’s role in gentrification, but caution against the idea that
abandoned urban spaces offer an implicit critique to neoliberal urban governance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2324-2338 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Environment and Planning A |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 1 Sept 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2015 |
Keywords
- High Line
- urban political ecology
- gentrification
- parks
- public spaces