Abstract
Background Capivasertib (AZD5363) is a potent selective oral inhibitor of all three isoforms of, the serine/threonine kinase, Akt. Akt inhibitors are anticipated to have maximal efficacy in combination with chemotherapy, targeted, or anti-hormonal drugs. The FAKTION trial investigated whether the addition of capivasertib to fulvestrant improved progression-free survival in patients with aromatase inhibitor resistant advanced breast cancer.
Methods In this randomised, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, postmenopausal women aged at least18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 and oestrogen receptor-positive,
HER2-negative, metastatic or locally advanced inoperable breast cancer who had relapsed or progressed on an aromatase inhibitor were recruited from 19 UK centres. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg (day 1) every 28 days (plus a loading dose on
day 15 of cycle 1) with either capivasertib 400 mg or matching placebo, orally twice daily on an intermittent weekly schedule of 4 days on and 3 days off (starting on cycle 1 day 15) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, loss to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment allocation was done using an interactive web-response system using a minimisation method (with a 20% random element) and the following stratification factors: measurable or non-measurable disease, primary or secondary aromatase inhibitor resistance, PIK3CA status, and PTEN status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival with a one-sided alpha of 0·20. Analyses were done by intention to treat. All recruitment is complete, and the trial is in follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01992952.
Findings Between March 16, 2015, and March 6, 2018, 183 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 140 (76%) were eligible and were randomly assigned to receive fulvestrant plus capivasertib (n=69) or fulvestrant plus placebo (n=71). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 4·9 months (IQR 1·6–11·6). At the time of primary analysis for progression-free survival, 112 progression-free survival events had occurred, 49 (71%) in 69 patients in the capivasertib group compared with 63 (89%) of 71 in the placebo group. Median
progression-free survival was 10·3 months (95% CI 5·0–13·2) in the capivasertib group versus 4·8 months (95% CI 3·1–7·7) in the placebo group, giving an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0·58 (95% CI 0·39–0·84) in favour of the
capivasertib group (two-sided p=0·0044; one-sided log rank test p-0·0018). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (22 [32%] of 69 patients in the capivasertib group vs 17 [24%] of 71 in the placebo group), diarrhoea (10 [14%] vs 3 [4%]), rash (14 [20%] vs 0), infection (4 [5%] vs 2 [3%]), and fatigue (1 [1%] vs 3 [4%]). Serious adverse reactions occurred only in the capivasertib group, and were acute kidney injury (2), diarrhoea (3), rash (2), hyperglycaemia (1), loss of consciousness (1), sepsis (1), and vomiting (1). One death, due to atypical pulmonary infection, was assessed as possibly related to capivasertib treatment. One further death in the capivasertib group had an unknown cause; all remaining deaths in both groups were disease related.
Interpretation Progression-free survival was significantly longer in participants who received capivasertib than in those who received placebo. The combination of capivasertib and fulvestrant warrants further investigation in phase 3 trials.
Methods In this randomised, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, postmenopausal women aged at least18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 and oestrogen receptor-positive,
HER2-negative, metastatic or locally advanced inoperable breast cancer who had relapsed or progressed on an aromatase inhibitor were recruited from 19 UK centres. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg (day 1) every 28 days (plus a loading dose on
day 15 of cycle 1) with either capivasertib 400 mg or matching placebo, orally twice daily on an intermittent weekly schedule of 4 days on and 3 days off (starting on cycle 1 day 15) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, loss to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment allocation was done using an interactive web-response system using a minimisation method (with a 20% random element) and the following stratification factors: measurable or non-measurable disease, primary or secondary aromatase inhibitor resistance, PIK3CA status, and PTEN status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival with a one-sided alpha of 0·20. Analyses were done by intention to treat. All recruitment is complete, and the trial is in follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01992952.
Findings Between March 16, 2015, and March 6, 2018, 183 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 140 (76%) were eligible and were randomly assigned to receive fulvestrant plus capivasertib (n=69) or fulvestrant plus placebo (n=71). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 4·9 months (IQR 1·6–11·6). At the time of primary analysis for progression-free survival, 112 progression-free survival events had occurred, 49 (71%) in 69 patients in the capivasertib group compared with 63 (89%) of 71 in the placebo group. Median
progression-free survival was 10·3 months (95% CI 5·0–13·2) in the capivasertib group versus 4·8 months (95% CI 3·1–7·7) in the placebo group, giving an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0·58 (95% CI 0·39–0·84) in favour of the
capivasertib group (two-sided p=0·0044; one-sided log rank test p-0·0018). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (22 [32%] of 69 patients in the capivasertib group vs 17 [24%] of 71 in the placebo group), diarrhoea (10 [14%] vs 3 [4%]), rash (14 [20%] vs 0), infection (4 [5%] vs 2 [3%]), and fatigue (1 [1%] vs 3 [4%]). Serious adverse reactions occurred only in the capivasertib group, and were acute kidney injury (2), diarrhoea (3), rash (2), hyperglycaemia (1), loss of consciousness (1), sepsis (1), and vomiting (1). One death, due to atypical pulmonary infection, was assessed as possibly related to capivasertib treatment. One further death in the capivasertib group had an unknown cause; all remaining deaths in both groups were disease related.
Interpretation Progression-free survival was significantly longer in participants who received capivasertib than in those who received placebo. The combination of capivasertib and fulvestrant warrants further investigation in phase 3 trials.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 345-357 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | The Lancet Oncology |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 5 Feb 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Aromatase Inhibitors/pharmacology
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Fulvestrant/administration & dosage
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Prognosis
- Pyrimidines/administration & dosage
- Pyrroles/administration & dosage
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Salvage Therapy
- Survival Rate
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre