Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gender and age make no difference in the re-irradiation of painful bone metastases: A secondary analysis of the NCIC CTG SC.20 randomized trial

  • Ronald Chow
  • , Keyue Ding
  • , Vithusha Ganesh
  • , Ralph M Meyer
  • , Yvette M van der Linden
  • , Daniel Roos
  • , William F Hartsell
  • , Peter Hoskin
  • , Jackson S Y Wu
  • , Abdenour Nabid
  • , Manouk van Acht
  • , Rinus Wanders
  • , Scott Babington
  • , William F Demas
  • , Carolyn F Wilson
  • , Rebecca K S Wong
  • , Michael Brundage
  • , Liting Zhu
  • , Edward Chow
  • Odette Cancer Centre
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • The University of Adelaide
  • Central DuPage Hospital Cancer Center
  • Mount Vernon Hospital
  • University of Calgary
  • Centre Hospitalier Université de Sherbrooke
  • Erasmus MC
  • The Stichting Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO) Clinic
  • Christchurch Hospital
  • Northeast Ohio Medical University
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
  • Queens University at Kingston
  • Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre
  • McMaster University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient's gender and age may influence physicians in prescribing palliative radiotherapy. The purpose of this secondary analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Symptom Control Trial SC.20 was to explore the gender and age differences in pain and patient reported outcomes in cancer patients with bone metastases undergoing re-irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Response to radiation was evaluated using the International Bone Metastases Consensus Endpoint Definitions. Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (C30) before and 2 months after re-irradiation.

RESULTS: A total of 847 patients were analyzed. At baseline, men had more dyspnea, and mild pain. Older patients consumed less analgesic. More women reported clinically significant improvement in mood and enjoyment of life in the BPI after radiation. Similarly, younger patients reported better improvement in enjoyment of life. There were no significant gender or age differences in overall survival, response to radiation, or in C30 scores at 2 months.

CONCLUSION: Similar benefit in terms of pain relief was observed across all patient groups. Cancer patients with bone metastases should be offered palliative re-irradiation irrespective of gender or age.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00080912; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00080912.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-546
Number of pages6
JournalRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Volume126
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Bone Neoplasms/physiopathology
  • Cancer Pain/etiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Palliative Care/methods
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
  • Quality of Life
  • Re-Irradiation
  • Sex Factors

Research Highlights, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender and age make no difference in the re-irradiation of painful bone metastases: A secondary analysis of the NCIC CTG SC.20 randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this