Gender pay equity: exploring the impact of formal, consistent and transparent Human Resource Management practices and information

Sebastian M Ugarte, Jill Rubery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

961 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores the extent to which formalised HR practices can reduce gender bias in pay setting or whether, following Acker (2006), gender bias may still be embedded within formalised HR practices. Detailed investigation of a critical case study of a Chilean finance organisation with a strong commitment to formalised, consistent and transparent pay practices based on individuated information, revealed only a small negative gender effect on pay and no identifiable gender effects in starting salaries, merit pay or promotion. These findings provide some support for the proposition that HR practices focused on job-related performance (Reskin, 2000) and limiting managerial discretion may facilitate gender pay equity. However, the case also reveals the limits of these policies. Women scored equally well on performance but formalised scores on future potential were higher for men and mattered more. A significant gender effect emerged in promotion to more senior posts. These mixed outcomes suggest that Acker's (2006) proposition still holds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-258
Number of pages17
JournalHuman Resource Management Journal
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date14 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • HRM practices
  • formalisation
  • gender pay gap
  • pay practices
  • transparency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender pay equity: exploring the impact of formal, consistent and transparent Human Resource Management practices and information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this