Generalized probabilistic linguistic evidential reasoning approach for multi-criteria decision-making under uncertainty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, the evidential reasoning (ER) approach can deal with uncertainties that are resulted from the limited knowledge and experience of experts. Due to the lack of information in the decision-making process, experts usually cannot give quantitative evaluations, but can only express their views with linguistic terms. It is usually impossible for experts to give accurate linguistic terms since they may hesitate among several linguistic terms or interval ones. In addition, experts may have different preferences for different linguistic evaluations. To fully express the evaluations, the probability can be introduced to model the preferences of experts. In this study, we propose the generalized probabilistic linguistic term set (G-PLTS) to represent the evaluation information with various linguistic forms. Then, the ER approach is investigated in the environment with G-PLTSs. Besides, a gained and lost dominance score (GLDS) method is utilized to rank the alternatives, forming an integrated method, which we call the generalized probabilistic linguistic evidential reasoning (GPLER) approach, to solve the MCDM problems with several uncertainties. Finally, we apply this method to the screening of high-risk population of lung cancer to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Keywords: General probabilistic linguistic term set; evidential reasoning approach; gained and lost dominance score method; screening of high-risk population for lung cancer
Original languageEnglish
JournalOperational Research Society. Journal
Early online date9 Sept 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Generalized probabilistic linguistic evidential reasoning approach for multi-criteria decision-making under uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this